As an avid social media user, I have been following 
the tweets and anger of social media users against Islam and Muslims 
especially when the terrorist group, Boko Haram strikes.
The
 anger heightened again when the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, ISIS, 
in their ungodly activity posted a video online recently showing an ISIS
 terrorist beheading an American journalist James Foley.
Muslims world-over have been condeming the act and are pained by the 
development. A few days ago, the Arab League condemned the terrorist 
group saying the ISIS had committed crimes and abuses against the Iraqi 
people.
Unfortunately, those who are ignorant of the religion 
blame Muslims and Islam for the zicked acts of the terrorist groups both
 in Nigerian and Iraq. They are ignorant because they refused to read 
about the religion.
For one thing, the Boko Haram just like the 
ISIS are not representing Muslims or Islam. Both massacre innocent 
Muslims and non-Muslims and their acts are at variance to the teachings 
of Islam.
Just as the Boko Haram has no support of any real 
Muslim; the ISIS has no legitimacy because has no approval from the 
people of Iraq and Syria. ISIS is a group of extremists and terrorists 
who use the religion to seize the power and wealth from the people.
Not
 many know that the sanctity of human life is one of the fundamentals of
 the tenets of Islam espoused by the Qur’an. The Glorious Qur’an says: 
“…take not life, which God hath made sacred, except by way of justice 
and law: thus doth He command you, that ye may learn wisdom.” (Al-Qur’an
 6:151).
Islam considers the life of every being as sacred and it 
does not matter which religion one belongs in upholding the sanctity of 
life as ordered by Allah. However, the sanctity of human life is 
accorded a special place.
The first and the foremost basic right 
of a human being is the right to live. The Glorious Qur’an further says:
 “…if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading 
mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and 
if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the 
whole people.” (Al-Qur’an 5:32)
Such is the value of a single 
human life. The Qur’an equates the taking of even one human life 
unjustly, with killing of all humanity.
Could it be possible that 
Islam, whose light ended the ‘dark ages’ in Europe, now propound the 
advent of an age of terror? Could a faith that has over 1.4 billion 
followers the world over, and over 7 million in America, actually 
advocate the killing and maiming of innocent people?
Could Islam, 
whose name itself stands for “peace” and “submission to God”, encourage 
its adherents to work for death and destruction of people including 
their own brothers?
It is now time to look at the sources of 
Islam, and its history to determine whether Islam does indeed advocate 
violence. Islam, far from being a militant dogma, is a way of life that 
transcends race and colour and ethnicity.
This goes to show that the the religion has drawn a line between liberalism and extremism.
For
 whatever reason, whether for loneliness or any emotional problem, every
 act of extremism leading to the extermination of human soul is 
abominable by the religion and would not represent the act of the 
religion.
Besides, terrorist leaders such as Abu Nidal: leader of a
 terrorist organization opposed to the state of Israel; Osama bin Laden:
 leader of the Al Qaeda – was disowned by his own parents in Saudi 
Arabia.
They all have not shown real character and trait of devout
 Muslims despite their toga of commando and their various Islamic 
education. They of course represent the interest of a certain few who 
are not entirely Muslims or better still brainwashed few who chose to be
 deviants and enemies of society.
Also, Muhammad Atta, the 
architect of the 9/11 attacks, and “the Egyptian hijacker who was 
driving the first plane, was a near alcoholic and was drinking vodka 
before he boarded the aircraft.”
Alcohol would be strictly off 
limits for a highly devout Muslim. Farouk AbdulMutallab too according to
 investigation, despite his three-month Arabic course in Yemen, his 
devout life in that country as attested by his personality and despite 
his seclusion (itkaf) could still not respect the sanctity of life as 
espoused by the Holy Qu’ran stated above.
He could not understand 
that it is a grave sin to unjustly take someone’s life. He was so 
disoriented to fathom that his action negates Islamic precepts which 
confer on him the identity of a Muslim.
The point being made here 
is that all terrorists all over the world who are refered to as Muslims,
 are not simply conventional believers; rather, they are violent 
extremists who manipulate religious concepts for their own selfish 
purposes.
There is a whole lot of difference between being a 
Muslim and individual actions that run contrary to Islamic tenet. Even 
as judgement rests with Almighty Allah, it is however unfair that the 
religion of Islam is held responsible for the acts of a handful of 
deviants in the society.
Just as it cannot rub the nation off its 
dignity, it cannot in anyway stigmatized Islam. It only takes 
intelligence and not ignorance to discern where Islam stands.

 
No comments:
Post a Comment